Too often, political debates fail to consider all of the alternatives. But if we are going to make rational and informed decisions, then we must consider all of the alternatives, as well as the pros and cons of each. We must consider the full context. Eminent domain serves as an example.
We are often told that, without eminent domain, certain types of projects could not be built. Without eminent domain, projects requiring a lot of land, such as pipelines or high-speed rail, could be stymied by individual land owners. Similarly, redevelopment of “blighted” areas might not occur without the use of eminent domain to seize homes and businesses. According to the conventional wisdom, the alternatives are: use eminent domain to seize private property or forgo projects that might have widespread benefit. Other alternatives are seldom, if ever, discussed. But other alternatives do exist. And if we want to consider the full context, then they must be discussed.
Click here to download the full policy brief.